Statement: Why dont you go to the court if the employer does not pay you the Provident Fund contribution?
Assumptions:
Courts can intervene in matters of dispute between employer and employees.
It is obligatory for the employer to pay the Provident Fund contribution to the employees.
Only assumption I is implicit
Only assumption II is implicit
Either I or II is implicit
Both I and II are implicit
Explanation:
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Clearly, the statement encourages one to go to court to get his Provident Fund from his employer. This implies that the issue comes under the jurisdiction of courts and that it is the right of the employee to claim his Provident Fund. So, both I and II are implicit.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Clearly, the statement encourages one to go to court to get his Provident Fund from his employer. This implies that the issue comes under the jurisdiction of courts and that it is the right of the employee to claim his Provident Fund. So, both I and II are implicit.